Alders voted to limit the number of public advertisements in the city by prohibiting nearly all new off-premises signs, or signs that advertise a business located other than where the sign stands. The ...
In 2015, the Supreme Court unanimously agreed that an Arizona town could not impose different restrictions on the display of temporary signs based on the messages they conveyed. The justices did not ...
The US Supreme Court Thursday ruled in a 6-3 decision that the Austin city code’s distinction between on-premises signs, which may be digitized, and off-premises signs, which may not, was “facially ...
The Austin Sign Code allows sign owners to digitize their on-premises signs (those that are located at the same site as the business or activity to which they relate). But it forbids owners from ...
The City of Austin's sign code is content-based: For example, a digital sign displayed outside a Catholic church stating that "Church services start at 9 am on Sunday" would be an on-premises sign ...
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a challenge to a Texas city’s ordinance that treats signs differently depending on whether they have a connection to the site where they are ...
Local governments in New York and across the country will not have to amend their sign ordinances now, following a rare land use-related decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. On April 21, the U.S.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results