The membership of the University IRB is sufficiently diverse to allow compliant review of the types of research in which University/Affiliate investigators commonly engage including social behavioral, ...

S ay your department gets a green light to bring in an outside expert — typically, an academic in the discipline — to do a comprehensive evaluation of your program. How does the department decide who ...

When Ulises Perez skimmed through the reviewer comments he had received on his rejected application for the US National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), he was taken ...

As part of its overall strategy to strengthen audit quality, in 2014 the AICPA issued the discussion paper Enhancing Audit Quality: Plans and Perspectives for the U.S. CPA Profession, which provides a ...

For me, the hardest part of the road to eventual publication is not the research or writing, both of which I enjoy. It’s dealing with the peer reviewers. Like most academics, I have a lot of journal ...

You have /3 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in. Is your area up for outside evaluation? In higher education, we typically know these as external ...

“Greetings! You’ve been added to our journal’s editorial system because we believe you would serve as an excellent reviewer of [Unexciting Title] manuscript …” You probably get these, too. It feels ...

made a significant and positive contribution to the peer review process, regardless of whether the paper was eventually accepted by the journal; taken both a broad and detailed view of the paper; ...

Pensoft and ARPHA have integrated Prophy’s AI-driven discovery system to provide editors with a broader and more diverse pool of qualified peer reviewers based on automated semantic analysis.